« ben nelson's toast in 2012 | Main | it gets old »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519d0669e20120a78fc513970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference an out for nelson?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Neither Nelson needs an excuse to vote against the conference bill. Since only 51 Senators are needed next time, Harry Reid has already designated who can opt out, and I'll bet the Nelsons are among them -- allowing them to brag to their ignorant constituents that they really were against (whatever the final bill says) all along. THIS WAS ALWAYS PART OF THE DEAL.
Posted by: RickGaber | 01/02/2010 at 08:50 PM
Conference reports can be filibustered.
Last I heard, that still applies to this one, too.
Has anyone heard any differently?
Posted by: John Galt | 01/02/2010 at 11:51 PM